Item Details

Title: DEVELOPMENT OF A NUTRITIONAL PROFILING SYSTEM FOR FREERANGING LIVESTOCK IN MAJOR AGRO-ECOLOGICAL ZONES OF SUB-SAHARAN AFRICA.

Date Published: 1999
Author/s: SARAH OSSIYA
Data publication:
Funding Agency :
Copyright/patents/trade marks:
Journal Publisher:
Affiliation: A&M University
Keywords: nutritional profiling system; free-range livestock

Abstract:

The potential of NIRS fecal profiling to predict crude protein (CP) and digestible organic matter (DOM) in the diet of free-ranging sheep and cattle, and condensed tannins in the diet of sheep, in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA), was examined. The calibration sets comprised of samples from the semi-arid, humid, and highland zones of SSA. USA samples were incorporated into the cattle calibration. Validation samples were independently derived. Cluster analysis was conducted to aid interpretation of results. Six sheep CP and DOM equations were created according to the combination of samples (“All locations”, “Ethiopia", “Ethiopia' and Nigeria”, “Niger”, “Extrusa” (CP) or "In vitro" (DOM), and “Stall” (CP) or "In vivo" (DOM). Calibration statistics were satisfactory, (SEC within twice the SEL, and R2>0.80), except for the “Niger” CP equation (R2 0.70). Selected wavelengths were biologically significant. Only the “All locations” CP validation had a R2 >0.80, (R2 0.88), indicating the potential for development of a robust CP sheep equation. DOM validation results were poor; the “Ethiopia and Nigeria” equation performed best (R20.40).Spectral diversity indicated between the Niger and validation samples was confirmed by cluster analysis. The sheep tannin calibration statistics were satisfactory (SEC 9.02, R2 0.91). Selected wavelengths were highly indicative of tannin-protein complexes. Validation statistics were less satisfactory: a high SEP 57.79, indicated laboratory technique differences, a R2 of 0.62 was below the required R2 0.80, but was indicative of the potential of the methodology to predict tannin in the diet of sheep. Spectral diversity was confirmed by a cluster analysis. Two equations were formulated for the cattle CP and DOM calibration: “Africa”, and “USA and Africa”. Both CP and DOM calibration statistics were deemed satisfactory. The CP validation statistics were similar to each other though not of predictive capacity. The DOM validation statistics were poor; SEP and R2 (“Africa” 12.27 and 0.09) and (“USA and Africa” 11.49 and 0.06), respectively. T outliers indicated differences in determination techniques. The findings substantiate the potential of NIRS fecal profiling as a methodology to predict the diet of free-ranging livestock across SSA. More diverse calibration sets, and standardization of laboratory techniques is required.