Item Details

Title: Performance of 15 Introduced Banana Genotypes in Three Agro-ecological Zones in Uganda

Date Published: 2011
Author/s: Okurut Asher Wilson
Data publication:
Funding Agency :
Copyright/patents/trade marks:
Journal Publisher:
Affiliation: NARO
Keywords: banana genotypes; Agro-ecological Zones;

Abstract:

Almost all the farmers in Uganda have no idea which banana genotype is best suited for their
location Subsequently there is dire need for information on genotypes and their performance
in the different Agro ecological zones of Uganda. This study was conducted to evaluate
performance of 15 recently developed banana genotypes in three different agro ecological
zones of Uganda between 2005 and 2007. The objectives of the study were to: (i) determine
the agronomic and yield performance of recently developed banana genotypes across the three
agro ecological zones of Uganda, (ii) determine the response of the recently developed banana
genotypes to major production constraints namely : Sigatoka, banana weevil borers, and
banana nematodes across the three agro ecological zones of Uganda, (iii) determine the bunch
yield weight stability across the different agro ecological zones of Uganda.
The study was conducted in three locations/ districts of Uganda namely: (Ruhinda) Rukungiri
located on high altitude with fertile soils, Bujumba Kalangala located on lake victoria islands
with highly leached soils and (Zirobwe) Luwero located in medium altitude with highly
weathered soils. Fifteen genotypes each planted in a line of ten plants were evaluated at three
farms in each of the three different agro ecological zones. The experimental design was a
completely randomized block design (CRBD) with plants spaced at 3m x 3m. Selection of
farms was based on location, availability and willinginess of the farmer to participate
effectively.
Data were collected on plant height plant girth, days from planting to flowering, days from
flowering to bunch harvesting, days from planting to bunch harvesting, bunch weight, number
of hands/clusters, total functional leaves at flowering, total functional leaves at bunch
harvesting, youngest leaf with Sigatoka spot, percentage weevil corm damage and nematode
xiii
root damage. Data were subjected to analyses of variance using the general linear model
(GLM) on SAS. Data on damage by weevils was subjected to arcsine transformation and and
means separated using Tukey comparison test (SAS 1991). Nematode data was transformed
using square root transformation. Stability analysis was done using bunch weight as a
parameter; principal component analysis on bunch weights was conducted. Significance levels
were set at (p> 0.05).
Results of the study indicate that there were highly positive correlations between bunch
weight, plant girth, hands/ clusters and functional leaves at flower shooting and functional
leaves at bunch harvesting. This implies that the yields of banana highly depend on these
variables. Plants with the largest girths were recorded in Rukungiri followed by Luwero and
Kalangala districts. Results on genotype stability on the basis of bunch weight across the three
agro ecological zones indicated that genotypes FHIA 17, FHIA 23, FH1A 25 and SH 3436-9,
Pisang ceylan and Yangambi KM 5 were high yielding with high resistance to pests and
diseases. While genotypes GCTCV-119, CRBP-39, and FHIA 21 were very low yielding with
poor resistance to pests and diseases. All genotypes took longer period to attain maturity
compared to Nfuuka, the local banana used as a check in this study. Stabity analysis revealed
four cartegories namely: (i) high yielding and un stable (ii) high yielding and stable (iii) low
yielding and un stable (iv) low yielding and stable. This suggests that that performance of the
genotypes varies with location. This implies that such information could be used to select and
recommend genotypes, based on their performance in various locations. Genotypes that
exhibited superior agronomic performance, high and stable bunch yield with resistance to
major pests and diseases, possess the potential for acceptability by the farmers and consumers.
The recommendation is that such genotypes should further be evaluated on farm for consumer
acceptability.